In Commonwealth v. O’Leary, a divided panel of the Appeals Court reversed the trial court judge’s order “dismissing a multiple-count indictment [which charged the defendant with various motor vehicle offenses] on the ground that the police failed to make a timely delivery of the citation pursuant to G.L. c.90C, §2.”…
Massachusetts Criminal Lawyer Blog
SJC Rules In Court Identification Permissible If Out of Court Identification is Unequivocal
In Commonwealth v. Dew, the Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the defendant’s conviction of masked armed robbery, ruling that the judge properly admitted evidence of the victim’s out-of-court show-up identification of the defendant, and concluding concluded that the judge properly allowed the victim to make an in-court identification of the defendant.…
SJC Issues Decision on Admissibility of FSTs in OUI Marijuana Cases
The Supreme Judicial Court recently issued a decision – Commonwealth v. Gerhardt – on the admissibility of field sobriety tests for marijuana use. The decision was issued in response to four reported questions by a trial judge in Worcester Country. In its opinion, the SJC set forth guidelines regarding “the admissibility…
SJC Narrows Scope of Felony Murder By Eliminating Constructive Malice
In Commonwealth v. Brown, a unanimous Supreme Judicial Court, pursuant to its authority under G. L. c.278, §33E, reduced the defendant’s conviction of first degree felony-murder to second degree murder, and a majority of the Court ruled “that the scope of felony-murder liability should be prospectively narrowed, [such] that, in…
SJC Reviews Juvenile Sentencing Practices Post Miller
In Commonwealth v. Perez, the Supreme Judicial Court reviewed a juvenile defendant’s sentence and ruled “that where a juvenile is sentenced for a nonmurder offense or offenses and the aggregate time to be served prior to parole eligibility exceeds that applicable to a juvenile convicted of murder, the sentence cannot…
SJC Rules that Judges Must Consider Defendant’s Financial Resources in Setting Bail
In an important decision for indigent defendant, the Supreme Judicial Court recently issued an opinion – Commonwealth v. Brangan – holding that a judge must consider a defendant’s ability to pay when setting bail at a bail hearing. The SJC specifically ruled that “in setting the amount of bail, whether under…
SJC Weighs in On Judge’s Ability to Order Specific Performance of Plea Agreement
The Supreme Judicial Court recently issued a decision – Commonwealth v. Francis – addressing plea agreements and when the court may order the specific performance of such an agreement by the Commonwealth. In its decision, the SJC reversed the allowance of the defendant’s motion for a new trial, ruling that…
SJC Rules that Massachusetts Courts May Not Hold Defendants on Immigration Detainers
In an important recent decision – Commonwealth v. Lunn – the SJC held that Massachusetts court officers had no authority, under either Federal or Massachusetts law, “to arrest and hold [Lunn] solely on the basis of a Federal civil immigration detainer.” The background was as follows. “After the sole pending…
SJC Rules that Search of Images on Digital Camera Exceeds Scope of Inventory
In Commonwealth v. Mauricio, the SJC reversed the denial of a motion to suppress images retrieved by the police during a warrantless search of a digital camera that was seized from the defendant’s person. The background was as follows. A police officer (Collins) “received a report that two ‘suspicious parties’…
SJC Rules That Blanket Prohibition Denying Sex Offender Ability to Seal Record is Unconstitutional
In Koe v. Commissioner of Probation, the Supreme Judicial Court ruled that G.L. c.276, §100A(6), which prohibits a former level two sex offender from sealing a criminal record, violates state rights to due process and is therefore unconstitutional as applied under the circumstances present in this case. The background was…